Hi Jesse, It seems to be a limitation in Saxon-EE, it does not read xsi:schemaLocation information from the inner element. The XML Schema specification says that the xsi:schemaLocation can appear anywhere in the document, see point 4 from http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#schema-loc *** 4. xsi:schemaLocation and xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation [attributes] can occur on any element. However, it is an error if such an attribute occurs after the first appearance of an element or attribute information item within an element information item initially ·validated· whose [namespace name] it addresses. According to the rules of Layer 1: Summary of the Schema-validity Assessment Core (§4.1), the corresponding schema may be lazily assembled, but is otherwise stable throughout ·assessment·. Although schema location attributes can occur on any element, and can be processed incrementally as discovered, their effect is essentially global to the ·assessment·. Definitions and declarations remain in effect beyond the scope of the element on which the binding is declared. *** A solution is to move the schema location information to the root element, like: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <testRoot xmlns ="testRoot" xmlns:xsi ="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="testRoot testRoot.xsd testConcrete testConcrete.xsd"> <testChild xmlns="testConcrete"> <data>some stuff</data> </testChild> </testRoot> Best Regards, George -- George Cristian Bina <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger http://www.oxygenxml.com On 1/18/11 8:55 PM, Jesse Pelton wrote:
Years ago, I set up a collection of schemas that use abstract elements and substitution groups to allow different models for certain elements. I just noticed that instance documents that use these schemas have always validated with the default processor (Xerces), and they appear to validate with MSXML 4.0, they don't validate with Saxon-EE or MSXML.NET. XML is a small part of what I do, so I'm not confident that my interpretation of the spec is correct. I've attached a test case that replicates the behavior I'm seeing in a minimal package. I'd appreciate it if someone could look it over and tell me who's right.
I think the documents explain themselves, but I'm happy to provide more information about anything that's not clear.
_______________________________________________ oXygen-user mailing list oXygen-user@oxygenxml.com http://www.oxygenxml.com/mailman/listinfo/oxygen-user