Hello, You can increase the priority of the XProc support with your votes for this feature on the page with the most wanted features: http://www.oxygenxml.com/survey.html Thank you, Sorin Lars Huttar wrote:
On 2/6/2009 11:28 AM, Florent Georges wrote:
Mike Starov wrote:
Is this feature ( being able to arbitrarily create a transformation pipeline ) on oXygen's development TODO list? I think this will be useful for many people. Its like XProc or Cocoon but its all local to the editor. If we speak about future features related to the scenarii in oXygen, I think it would be more consistent to invest on XProc support, and allowing one to use an XProc script to drive a scenario.
But I am maybe not totally objective here ;-)
Regards,
I would agree that if you're going to provide XML pipeline features, it would be more useful if you could go with an existing standard (i.e. XProc), rather than reinventing the wheel... then the pipelines we use in Oxygen could be used elsewhere and vice versa.
That would also help identify needed improvements to the XProc draft standard, as well as helping to drive adoption.
Lars