Not really as it is duplicated on the screen. I say remove it. Marijan (Mario) Madunic Publishing Specialist New Flyer Industries mario_madunic@newflyer.com -----Original Message----- From: oxygen-user-bounces@oxygenxml.com [mailto:oxygen-user-bounces@oxygenxml.com] On Behalf Of Radu Coravu Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 5:57 AM To: oXygen User ML Subject: [oXygen-user] Functions signatures in XSLT documentation Hi, When documentation is generated from an XSLT 2.0 we are thinking to make the link to a function more compact by removing the type of its parameters: f:function-name($param as xs:string) --> f:function-name($param) Since the parameter type doesn't count for function overload the function should be equally easy to identify. The type of the parameter can still be seen by following the link (this is only for the link text). So the question for you XSLT developers is : do you find the parameter type useful in these references? I attached a screenshot for more details. Regards, Radu Radu Coravu <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger http://www.oxygenxml.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This communication (and any and all information or material transmitted with this communication) is confidential, may be privileged and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, retransmission, circulation, distribution, reproduction, conversion to hard copy, copying or other use of this communication, information or material is strictly prohibited and may be illegal. If you received this communication in error or if it is forwarded to you without the express authorization of New Flyer, please notify us immediately by telephone or by return email and permanently delete the communication, information and material from any computer, disk drive, diskette or other storage device or media. Thank you.