Sean Wheller wrote:
--- Sorin Ristache <sorin@sync.ro> wrote:
Hi,
I already found a workaround in the stylesheets myself and probably we will include FOP 0.20.5 in the next release of <oXygen/>.
Thats great. But does that mean that the XSL's shipped will be a modified version of those on docbook.sf.net? I know that the extensions etc. are not bundled. But I always thought that the XSL's were 1:1 the same as those on SF.
Just a minor modification. Otherwise DocBook documents having an FO tree that contains blank-body sections cannot be rendered to PDF documents with Apache FOP 0.20.5. You already tried that with
simple document I sent you. When a future version of FOP handles blank-body sections correctly or the DocBook
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sorin Ristache" <sorin@sync.ro> To: <oxygen-user@oxygenxml.com> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:19 AM Subject: Re: [oXygen-user] JAI the very short and stylesheets on SF are made
compatible with FOP the stylesheets included in <oXygen/> will be 1:1 the same as the SF ones.
OK. People like me don't use the Stylesheets bundled with Oxygen. We tend to move with the SF CVS. Can you post the patch, so that we can circumvent this problem should we need to use article inside book. Thanks, Sean Wheller __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/
Sean Wheller wrote:
People like me don't use the Stylesheets bundled with Oxygen. We tend to move with the SF CVS. Can you post the patch, so that we can circumvent this problem should we need to use article inside book.
Comment the code <xsl:if test="$fop.extensions = 0"> <xsl:attribute name="region-name">blank-body</xsl:attribute> </xsl:if> inside template "setup.pagemasters" in pagesetup.xsl. This modification will be included in the next release of <oXygen/>. Best regards, Sorin
participants (2)
-
Sean Wheller -
Sorin Ristache