- oXygen-user - www.oxygenxml.com

Warning on startup SuSE 9.2
by Sean Wheller 13 Dec '04

13 Dec '04

Hi, Just did an upgrade to SuSE 9.2. On starting Oxygen 5.0 I get the following error: Warning: Cannot convert string "-b&h-lucida-medium-r-normal-sans-*-140-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1" to type FontStruct Oxygen still starts and seems to work fine, but I've never had this error before with upgrades on SuSE. -- Sean Wheller sean(a)enbaya.co.za http://www.enbaya.co.za

2 1

Ugraded JVM---Oxygen can not find new JVM
by Peter Charles 06 Dec '04

06 Dec '04

Hello I upgraded my JVM and Oxygen could not find the new JVM. (All other java apps work fine) I was able to start oxygen using the bat file, but would like to set the jvm properly. I could not find any place to do so. Your instructions on the forum say: - use oxtgen.bat to start the application and eventually edit it to specify the full path to Java Where do I do the "edit" Peter

2 1

Surround In
by Peter Charles 24 Nov '04

24 Nov '04

Hello, I particularly like the "surround in" (although "surround with" makes more sense to me) feature of Oxygen, however, in 5.0 the convenient list of possible xsl elements are now the last items in an extremely long drop down list of possible tags. Is there any way to put the xsl tags first in the drop down list, or just eliminate the other tags, or even make it namespace aware? Also, Is it possible to display elements from different namespaces in different colors? Thanks Peter

2 1

XML formatter: one attribute per line?
by Matthias Gärtner 18 Nov '04

18 Nov '04

Hello, apart from sorting attributes, can I specify that each attribute is to be put on its onl line? Thank you, Matthias

2 1

RE: [oXygen-user] Please help in interpretingan "derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2:Error for type 'GridDomainType'. The particle of the type is not avalid restriction of the particle of the base."
by John.Hockaday＠ga.gov.au 16 Nov '04

16 Nov '04

George, Well that shows how much I know about the W3C XML Schema specification. ;--) I found DTDs very easy, and RELAXNG not too hard but the XML Schema is just too hard. ;--) I need to attend a course or something to get my head around this one. Thanks for the very good explanation. I think that I followed the explanation in the first archived email hypertext link that you mention below. I know you or someone on this list would know the answer. Thank you again. John > -----Original Message----- > From: oxygen-user-bounces(a)oxygenxml.com > [mailto:oxygen-user-bounces@oxygenxml.com] On Behalf Of > George Cristian Bina > Sent: Monday, 15 November 2004 7:10 PM > To: Hockaday John > Cc: oxygen-user(a)oxygenxml.com > Subject: Re: [oXygen-user] Please help in interpretingan > "derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2:Error for type > 'GridDomainType'. The particle of the type is not avalid > restriction of the particle of the base." > > > Hi John, > > The above error is not about ambiguity. > The derivation in XML Schema defines an algorithm that causes > some types > that are intuitively derived from others to be considered not > correctly > derived. There are some workarounds in these cases, see for instance > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2004Oct/0097.html > where surrounding the element with a choice solves the problem. > While Michael Key and Henry Thomson consider that a different > algorithm > than the one described by the specification is ok to allow > these cases > to be considered valid (see the next messages on the thread) Noah > Mendelsohn (one of the XML Schema editors) disagree: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2004Nov/0023.html > > Now, if RectifiedGrid is ok to belong in the substitution group with > ImplicitGeometry as head instead of Grid then I guess it is ok. > Otherwise it may be possible to find a solution as the one in > the above > xmlschema-dev message. > > Best Regards, > George > > > John.Hockaday(a)ga.gov.au wrote: > > Hi George, > > > > I'm sorry for not getting back to you earlier. I was sick > all last week. > > Here are some results that was found while I was away: > > > > 1. The GML 3.1.1 is still being developed and that is why > you couldn't find > > it. > > > > 2. one of the team members found out that the error was > caused by the > > grids.xsd which is part of the GML 3.1.1 suite. > > > > 3. The fix is as follows: > > > > Change: > > > > ############ > > <element name="RectifiedGrid" type="gml:RectifiedGridType" > > substitutionGroup="gml:Grid"/> > > ############ > > > > To: > > > > ############ > > <element name="RectifiedGrid" type="gml:RectifiedGridType" > > substitutionGroup="gml:_ImplicitGeometry"> > > <annotation> > > <documentation>Should be > substitutionGroup="gml:Grid" > > but changed in order to accomplish Xerces-J schema > validation</documentation> > > </annotation> > > ############ > > > > This has fixed the ambiguity error. > > > > I want to thank you for answering my email. I'm sure that > you would have > > been able to track down the problem as you have done so in > the past when I > > post to this list but it seems like someone else looking at > GML 3.1.1 beat > > you to it. > > > > Thanks again. > > > > > > John > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: George Cristian Bina [mailto:george@oxygenxml.com] > >>Sent: Friday, 5 November 2004 7:41 PM > >>To: Hockaday John > >>Cc: oxygen-user(a)oxygenxml.com > >>Subject: Re: [oXygen-user] Please help in interpreting an > >>"derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2: Error for type > >>'GridDomainType'. The particle of the type is not a valid > >>restriction of the particle of the base." > >> > >> > >>Hi John, > >> > >>I cannot find GML 3.1.1. Can you point us to that ? > >>The error directs to the GridDomainType and DomainSetType. > The first > >>seems not to be a valid restriction of the second. The > >>rcase-Recurse.2 > >>points you to the following part of the spec that is related > >>with the error: > >>*** > >>2 There is a complete ·order-preserving· functional mapping > from the > >>particles in the {particles} of R to the particles in the > >>{particles} of > >>B such that all of the following must be true: > >>2.1 Each particle in the {particles} of R is a ·valid > restriction· of > >>the particle in the {particles} of B it maps to as defined by > >>Particle > >>Valid (Restriction) (§3.9.6). > >>2.2 All particles in the {particles} of B which are not > >>mapped to by any > >>particle in the {particles} of R are ·emptiable· as defined > >>by Particle > >>Emptiable (§3.9.6). > >>*** > >> > >>The best thing is allow us to reproduce the error. Otherwise > >>send us at > >>least the DomainSetType definition. > >> > >>Best Regards, > >>George > >> > >>John.Hockaday(a)ga.gov.au wrote: > >> > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>We have been trying to validate the GML version 3.1.1. We > >> > >>have managed to > >> > >>>track down 140 of the 144 errors in the XML Schema. The > >> > >>last four errors are > >> > >>>really puzzling. Could someone please help with > >> > >>interpreting and fixing the > >> > >>>errors? > >>> > >>>The errors are: > >>> > >>>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#rcase-Recurse E > >> > >>rcase-Recurse.2: There is > >> > >>>not a complete functional mapping between the particles. > >> > >>coverage.xsd > >> > >>>file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd 407:37 > >>>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#derivation-ok-rest > riction E > >>>derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2: Error for type > >> > >>'GridDomainType'. The > >> > >>>particle of the type is not a valid restriction of the > >> > >>particle of the base. > >> > >>>coverage.xsd > >> > >>file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd > >> > >>>407:37 > >>>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#rcase-Recurse E > >> > >>rcase-Recurse.2: There is > >> > >>>not a complete functional mapping between the particles. > >> > >>coverage.xsd > >> > >>>file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd 407:37 > >>>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#derivation-ok-rest > riction E > >>>derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2: Error for type > >> > >>'GridDomainType'. The > >> > >>>particle of the type is not a valid restriction of the > >> > >>particle of the base. > >> > >>>coverage.xsd > >> > >>file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd > >> > >>>407:37 > >>> > >>>The section in the coverage.xsd file looks like this: > >>> <complexType name="GridCoverageType"> > >>> <complexContent> > >>> <restriction > >> > >>base="gml:AbstractDiscreteCoverageType"> > >> > >>> <sequence> > >>> <group > >>>ref="gml:StandardObjectProperties"/> > >>> <element ref="gml:boundedBy" > >>>minOccurs="0"/> > >>> <element ref="gml:gridDomain"/> > >>> <element ref="gml:rangeSet"/> > >>> <element > >> > >>ref="gml:coverageFunction" > >> > >>>minOccurs="0"/> > >>> </sequence> > >>> </restriction> > >>> </complexContent> > >>> <element name="gridDomain" type="gml:GridDomainType" > >>>substitutionGroup="gml:domainSet"/> > >>>  > >> > >>> <complexType name="GridDomainType"> > >>> <complexContent> > >>> <restriction base="gml:DomainSetType"> > >>> <sequence minOccurs="0"> > >>> <element ref="gml:Grid"/> > >>> </sequence> > >>> <attributeGroup > >>>ref="gml:AssociationAttributeGroup"/> > >>> </restriction> > >>> </complexContent> > >>> </complexType> > >>> > >>>Can anyone see the problem? > >>> > >>>Thanks > >>> > >>> > >>>John Hockaday > >>>Geoscience Australia > >>>GPO Box 378 > >>>Canberra ACT 2601 > >>>(02) 6249 9735 > >>>http://www.ga.gov.au/ > >>> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>oXygen-user mailing list > >>>oXygen-user(a)oxygenxml.com > >>>http://www.oxygenxml.com/mailman/listinfo/oxygen-user > >> > _______________________________________________ > oXygen-user mailing list > oXygen-user(a)oxygenxml.com > http://www.oxygenxml.com/mailman/listinfo/oxygen-user >

1 0

Quisiera correr el download
by Alvaro G. Gonzalez 15 Nov '04

15 Nov '04

Quisiera saber que es lo que hay que poner en la parte de registracion del oxigen 5.0 pues no me deja registrarme, y poder usar el programa. Desde ya muchas gracias A/P Alvaro G. Gonzalez Direccion General de Registros 18 de julio 1730 Piso 4 Tel. 4025638 Fax. 4006583 alvaro(a)mercurio.dgr.gub.uy

2 1

RE: [oXygen-user] Please help in interpreting an "derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2: Error for type 'GridDomainType'. The particle of the type is not a valid restriction of the particle of the base."
by John.Hockaday＠ga.gov.au 15 Nov '04

15 Nov '04

Hi George, I'm sorry for not getting back to you earlier. I was sick all last week. Here are some results that was found while I was away: 1. The GML 3.1.1 is still being developed and that is why you couldn't find it. 2. one of the team members found out that the error was caused by the grids.xsd which is part of the GML 3.1.1 suite. 3. The fix is as follows: Change: ############ <element name="RectifiedGrid" type="gml:RectifiedGridType" substitutionGroup="gml:Grid"/> ############ To: ############ <element name="RectifiedGrid" type="gml:RectifiedGridType" substitutionGroup="gml:_ImplicitGeometry"> <annotation> <documentation>Should be substitutionGroup="gml:Grid" but changed in order to accomplish Xerces-J schema validation</documentation> </annotation> ############ This has fixed the ambiguity error. I want to thank you for answering my email. I'm sure that you would have been able to track down the problem as you have done so in the past when I post to this list but it seems like someone else looking at GML 3.1.1 beat you to it. Thanks again. John > -----Original Message----- > From: George Cristian Bina [mailto:george@oxygenxml.com] > Sent: Friday, 5 November 2004 7:41 PM > To: Hockaday John > Cc: oxygen-user(a)oxygenxml.com > Subject: Re: [oXygen-user] Please help in interpreting an > "derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2: Error for type > 'GridDomainType'. The particle of the type is not a valid > restriction of the particle of the base." > > > Hi John, > > I cannot find GML 3.1.1. Can you point us to that ? > The error directs to the GridDomainType and DomainSetType. The first > seems not to be a valid restriction of the second. The > rcase-Recurse.2 > points you to the following part of the spec that is related > with the error: > *** > 2 There is a complete ·order-preserving· functional mapping from the > particles in the {particles} of R to the particles in the > {particles} of > B such that all of the following must be true: > 2.1 Each particle in the {particles} of R is a ·valid restriction· of > the particle in the {particles} of B it maps to as defined by > Particle > Valid (Restriction) (§3.9.6). > 2.2 All particles in the {particles} of B which are not > mapped to by any > particle in the {particles} of R are ·emptiable· as defined > by Particle > Emptiable (§3.9.6). > *** > > The best thing is allow us to reproduce the error. Otherwise > send us at > least the DomainSetType definition. > > Best Regards, > George > > John.Hockaday(a)ga.gov.au wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have been trying to validate the GML version 3.1.1. We > have managed to > > track down 140 of the 144 errors in the XML Schema. The > last four errors are > > really puzzling. Could someone please help with > interpreting and fixing the > > errors? > > > > The errors are: > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#rcase-Recurse E > rcase-Recurse.2: There is > > not a complete functional mapping between the particles. > coverage.xsd > > file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd 407:37 > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#derivation-ok-restriction E > > derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2: Error for type > 'GridDomainType'. The > > particle of the type is not a valid restriction of the > particle of the base. > > coverage.xsd > file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd > > 407:37 > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#rcase-Recurse E > rcase-Recurse.2: There is > > not a complete functional mapping between the particles. > coverage.xsd > > file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd 407:37 > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#derivation-ok-restriction E > > derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2: Error for type > 'GridDomainType'. The > > particle of the type is not a valid restriction of the > particle of the base. > > coverage.xsd > file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd > > 407:37 > > > > The section in the coverage.xsd file looks like this: > > <complexType name="GridCoverageType"> > > <complexContent> > > <restriction > base="gml:AbstractDiscreteCoverageType"> > > <sequence> > > <group > > ref="gml:StandardObjectProperties"/> > > <element ref="gml:boundedBy" > > minOccurs="0"/> > > <element ref="gml:gridDomain"/> > > <element ref="gml:rangeSet"/> > > <element > ref="gml:coverageFunction" > > minOccurs="0"/> > > </sequence> > > </restriction> > > </complexContent> > > <element name="gridDomain" type="gml:GridDomainType" > > substitutionGroup="gml:domainSet"/> > >  > > <complexType name="GridDomainType"> > > <complexContent> > > <restriction base="gml:DomainSetType"> > > <sequence minOccurs="0"> > > <element ref="gml:Grid"/> > > </sequence> > > <attributeGroup > > ref="gml:AssociationAttributeGroup"/> > > </restriction> > > </complexContent> > > </complexType> > > > > Can anyone see the problem? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > John Hockaday > > Geoscience Australia > > GPO Box 378 > > Canberra ACT 2601 > > (02) 6249 9735 > > http://www.ga.gov.au/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > oXygen-user mailing list > > oXygen-user(a)oxygenxml.com > > http://www.oxygenxml.com/mailman/listinfo/oxygen-user >

2 1

Model view and Relax NG
by Paul 12 Nov '04

12 Nov '04

Just checking if the model view doesn't work with Relax NG schema's (XML and compact). Or is this something to be configured? Paul

2 1

Please help in interpreting an "derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2: Error for type 'GridDomainType'. The particle of the type is not a valid restriction of the particle of the base."
by John.Hockaday＠ga.gov.au 05 Nov '04

05 Nov '04

Hi, We have been trying to validate the GML version 3.1.1. We have managed to track down 140 of the 144 errors in the XML Schema. The last four errors are really puzzling. Could someone please help with interpreting and fixing the errors? The errors are: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#rcase-Recurse E rcase-Recurse.2: There is not a complete functional mapping between the particles. coverage.xsd file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd 407:37 http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#derivation-ok-restriction E derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2: Error for type 'GridDomainType'. The particle of the type is not a valid restriction of the particle of the base. coverage.xsd file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd 407:37 http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#rcase-Recurse E rcase-Recurse.2: There is not a complete functional mapping between the particles. coverage.xsd file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd 407:37 http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#derivation-ok-restriction E derivation-ok-restriction.5.4.2: Error for type 'GridDomainType'. The particle of the type is not a valid restriction of the particle of the base. coverage.xsd file:/E:/downloads/GML3.1/GML2004-10-29/base/coverage.xsd 407:37 The section in the coverage.xsd file looks like this: <complexType name="GridCoverageType"> <complexContent> <restriction base="gml:AbstractDiscreteCoverageType"> <sequence> <group ref="gml:StandardObjectProperties"/> <element ref="gml:boundedBy" minOccurs="0"/> <element ref="gml:gridDomain"/> <element ref="gml:rangeSet"/> <element ref="gml:coverageFunction" minOccurs="0"/> </sequence> </restriction> </complexContent> <element name="gridDomain" type="gml:GridDomainType" substitutionGroup="gml:domainSet"/>  <complexType name="GridDomainType"> <complexContent> <restriction base="gml:DomainSetType"> <sequence minOccurs="0"> <element ref="gml:Grid"/> </sequence> <attributeGroup ref="gml:AssociationAttributeGroup"/> </restriction> </complexContent> </complexType> Can anyone see the problem? Thanks John Hockaday Geoscience Australia GPO Box 378 Canberra ACT 2601 (02) 6249 9735 http://www.ga.gov.au/

2 1

wish: reindenting without rewrapping
by Lars Huttar 29 Oct '04

29 Oct '04

Dear Oxygen folks, I'm not sure if this is the right mailing list for feature wishes, but here's one. I love the pretty-printing ("Format and indent") feature as a way to fix indentation. However, I also like to include blank lines in my stylesheets to make them more readable, e.g. to separate one template from the next. But when I use Format-and-indent, the blank lines are eliminated. I also sometimes like to have comments following an XSLT instruction on the same line. So it would be nice to have a way to reindent without affecting line breaks. E.g. just a "reindent" command. (Ctrl+Alt+P? Ctrl+Shift+I?) It would be possible to offer this functionality as a Preferences option for the Format-and-indent command, but that would not be ideal since there are often times that you DO want to rewrap long lines and so on. Switching a preferences option on and off would be annoying. The ideal would be to have a separate command. Regards, Lars

2 2